Can We Better Predict Human Decisions?
How psychologically grounded simulation could help us understand and predict human behavior.
What do AI models of human behavior still miss? Five leading scientists explain how people read a situation, why the same person decides differently from one day to the next, why emotion only predicts behavior in context, how the stories a community tells shape what its members decide, and why a person is best modeled as a system of if-then responses to situations. Together they make the case for simulations that go beyond static personas and population averages.
How psychologically grounded simulation could help us understand and predict human behavior.
Why people react differently to the same situation, and what that means for human simulation.
Why emotions can only predict behavior when we understand the person and the context.
UC BerkeleyFolklorist & Computational Social ScientistHow legends, rumors, and personal stories link a community's beliefs to the decisions its members make.
Why simulating a human requires modeling situations as people experience them, not trait scores or averages.
Papers and findings from Heura Lab on decision science, synthetic populations, and the psychology of human behavior.
Synthetic populations can predict what people will do; Heura Lab is building the psychological engine to explain why and simulate what changes their decisions.
Heura LabA century of psychology, read as one layered architecture—and what it requires of any system that claims to simulate human behavior.
Heura LabWe built two populations of 1,000 AI personas and scored them against real US benchmarks. Richer personas cut error by more than half.
Chretien LiHow the Heura Lab Platform turns weeks-long research cycles into minutes—without giving up control of your data.
Bal KumarFinding a psychologically meaningful direction inside a language model, pushing on it, and seeing what moves—a first test on coping potential.
Heura LabA framework for evaluating synthetic populations against real-world evidence—and for reporting where they diverge.
Heura LabA three-tier validation of 500 LLM-based synthetic voters against Su & Shenhav (2026), Nature Communications—reproducing the effect's magnitude, boundary conditions, and reversal.
Olga Sebastian, Chretien LiHow a synthetic audience surfaced the framing that resonated with a new target segment for Luxeire.
Heura Lab