Perspectives from Our Advisors

What do AI models of human behavior still miss? Five leading scientists explain how people read a situation, why the same person decides differently from one day to the next, why emotion only predicts behavior in context, how the stories a community tells shape what its members decide, and why a person is best modeled as a system of if-then responses to situations. Together they make the case for simulations that go beyond static personas and population averages.

UC BerkeleyClinical Psychologist

Can We Better Predict Human Decisions?

How psychologically grounded simulation could help us understand and predict human behavior.

Vanderbilt UniversityPioneer in Affective Computing & Virtual Humans

Same Situation, Different Decisions

Why people react differently to the same situation, and what that means for human simulation.

The Ohio State UniversitySocial Psychologist & Affective Neuroscientist

Beyond the Average Person

Why emotions can only predict behavior when we understand the person and the context.

Timothy R. Tangherlini, Folklorist & Computational Social Scientist at UC BerkeleyUC BerkeleyFolklorist & Computational Social Scientist

Stories Told as True

How legends, rumors, and personal stories link a community's beliefs to the decisions its members make.

Özlem Ayduk, Professor of Psychology at UC BerkeleyUC BerkeleyProfessor of Psychology

The Person Is the System

Why simulating a human requires modeling situations as people experience them, not trait scores or averages.

Our Research

Papers and findings from Heura Lab on decision science, synthetic populations, and the psychology of human behavior.

2026Foundations

Why Synthetic Populations Work

Synthetic populations can predict what people will do; Heura Lab is building the psychological engine to explain why and simulate what changes their decisions.

Heura Lab
2026Foundations

Psychological Frameworks for Computational Modeling of Human Behavior

A century of psychology, read as one layered architecture—and what it requires of any system that claims to simulate human behavior.

Heura Lab
2026Research

Can Synthetic Personas Answer Like Real Americans?

We built two populations of 1,000 AI personas and scored them against real US benchmarks. Richer personas cut error by more than half.

Chretien Li
2026Platform

Accelerating the Scale

How the Heura Lab Platform turns weeks-long research cycles into minutes—without giving up control of your data.

Bal Kumar
2026Research

Steering LLMs with Psychological Variables

Finding a psychologically meaningful direction inside a language model, pushing on it, and seeing what moves—a first test on coping potential.

Heura Lab
2026Research

How Synthetic Population Error Is Measured

A framework for evaluating synthetic populations against real-world evidence—and for reporting where they diverge.

Heura Lab
2026Research

Synthetic Voters Replicate a Landmark Finding on Why People Opt Out of Voting

A three-tier validation of 500 LLM-based synthetic voters against Su & Shenhav (2026), Nature Communications—reproducing the effect's magnitude, boundary conditions, and reversal.

Olga Sebastian, Chretien Li
2026Case Study

Testing Luxury Brand Messaging Before Launch

How a synthetic audience surfaced the framing that resonated with a new target segment for Luxeire.

Heura Lab